November 2, 2015

About

About the Competition

The FSAE competition between 32 teams has historically been held in Lincoln, Nebraska, however, this year it will be held in Fontana, California. The competition consists of events spread into two groups: dynamic events and static events. The racing events consist of an acceleration test, an endurance race, and an obstacle course. The Business events consist of random knowledge checks on every part of the car, and a business presentation.


History of the Team

The Formula Electric Team was founded in February of 2012 with the goal of participating in FSAE Electric by June of 2014. In 2013 the team established a knowledge base and sorted out the logistics that went along with starting the Formula Electric team.


Production of the first car, Fe01-Duchess, began in the fall semester of 2013. This was the team’s first attempt at a yearly production cycle and a significant amount of knowledge was gained in the first several months. The 2014-2015 year was spent re-engineering the electrical control system and finishing up minor mechanical projects on Duchess.

Duchess entered into competition the 2015 season. Several team members attended the competition and used it to gather ideas about ways to improve the car for the next year’s competition. The car was fully functional, but a misinterpretation of the battery box rules prevented the team from competing in the dynamic events. In spite of this, the team earned 5th place overall thanks to their strong performances in the static events and received positive feedback on the mechanical design of the vehicle.


By 2016, Formula Electric had established a core group of knowledgeable leaders. Using what they had learned from previous years, this group set out to design and produce an entirely new car that would be explicitly rules compliant. The team produced their second car, Fe02-Artemis, in just under a year. Artemis passed all technical inspections and participated in all the events at the 2016 competition. Despite an electrical issue that caused the team to drop out of the endurance race, Formula Electric earned their second 5th place finish.

The 2016-2017 season started with an analysis of how Fe02-Artemis had performed at competition. While the team was pleased with the overall result; there was a feeling that in the pursuit of rules compliance the car had become overbuilt. It was decided to focus the year’s efforts on redesigning the mechanical systems of the car and optimizing them for weight.


The 2017 car, Fe03, was over 50 lbs. lighter than its predecessors and was the team’s most successful car to date. The team earned 4th place overall and was awarded trophies for their finishes in the cost (2nd) and efficiency (1st) events.


The 2017-2018 season began on a low note. Our title sponsor pulled out of our project and recruitment was at an all-time low. Taking these setbacks into account, the team had to reevaluate their goals for the year and cut some projects due to manpower. The primary focus became a more predictable suspension system along with the team’s first aero package. Both these goals were met and surpassed, with the aero package also including a DRS (drag reduction system), proving the ambition of the team despite the earlier problems. Due to a mechanical failure however, the car did not pass brake inspection, it did however place 4th in the cost event, and 1st in the business event.


The 2018-2019 season began as a transition period for the team. Due to low recruiting numbers in the previous year, the team was left with very few experienced members. Most of the knowledgeable and experienced members from the previous seasons graduated before this season, leaving a huge knowledge gap. One of the largest projects undertaken for the year was to remake the control system for the car, however, due to unforeseen circumstances (vendor manufacturing issues) and organizational issues, even though many improvements were made to the car, the team was unable to compete at the 2019 competition. This led to a large restructure in how the team operated. Several changes were made once the new officers took their position. Primarily, instead of relying so heavily on few members to be experts on the car, the team decided to push for a more standard knowledge base for all members by creating a database to record all processes, ideas, and designs. Furthermore, improved systems were implemented to keep everyone accountable, productive, and educated throughout the project. Even though the team did not attend competition, many good things came out of the season, primarily: a team who is organized and set up for success for many years to come.


Leadership


Daniel Szanto

CEO

Cell: (417) 908-7113

dpsn2x@umsystem.edu

Dylan VanBuskirk

CIO

Cell: (816) 525-0948

dlvkhk@umsystem.edu

Harlan Johnson

CTO

Cell: (816) 341-1835

hrjymc@umsystem.edu

Choose Design Team
  • Student Design Teams
  • Missouri S&T Racing
  • Miner Aviation
  • Baja SAE
  • Missouri S&T Concrete Canoe
  • Engineers Without Borders
  • Formula SAE Electric
  • Human Powered Vehicle Team
  • Missouri S&T iGEM
  • Missouri S&T Underwater Robotics
  • Missouri S&T Solar Car Team
  • Missouri S&T Solar House Design Team
  • Steel Bridge Design Team
  • Mars Rover Design Team
  • Multirotor Robot Design Team
  • Missouri S&T Chem E Car
  • Missouri S&T Rocket Design Team
  • Miner Motorcycle Design Team
  • Combat Robotics
  • Nuclear Science Design Team
  • Space Week
  • Solar House Dev